As Uber and Lyft continue to dominate the rideshare market, accidents involving Uber and Lyft drivers remain common. Whether your client was a passenger, a third-party driver, or the rideshare driver themselves, these rideshare claim cases present unique opportunities and challenges. The legal issues are not always obvious, and a standard car accident approach can leave significant compensation on the table.

To build a strong case against a rideshare company, attorneys must understand the structure of these businesses, the insurance coverage frameworks, and the ways in which liability can shift based on the status of the app. Enforcing wage laws has become a critical aspect of legal actions taken by officials against Uber and Lyft. These efforts aim to ensure that drivers are fairly compensated and receive necessary benefits. As such, a rideshare claim may appear simple at first glance, but without careful legal framing, key compensation avenues can be missed.

Curious to learn more? Keep reading for a deeper dive into how to build a solid, strategic case against Uber and Lyft by focusing on five core areas: identifying the right parties, determining app status, preserving digital evidence, utilizing corporate policy language, and framing damages for negotiation.

Understanding the Legal Positioning of Uber and Lyft as Independent Contractors

Uber and Lyft operate under a platform model. They do not consider themselves transportation companies. Instead, they define themselves as technology providers who connect independent contractors with riders. This distinction is critical because it influences how liability is structured.

Since drivers are considered independent contractors and not employees, Uber and Lyft often argue that they are not liable for their drivers’ negligence. However, these companies do provide liability insurance during specific parts of the ride process. Understanding when that coverage applies is essential to unlocking higher-value claims.

Lawsuits have been filed against Uber and Lyft for wage theft, emphasizing the misclassification of drivers as independent contractors. Wage and hour laws are relevant here as they aim to ensure drivers receive essential labor protections such as overtime and minimum wage.

Your job as an attorney is to move beyond the classification defense and focus on conduct, policies, and actual control. If a rideshare company sets rules for how drivers operate, disciplines drivers, or monitors ride performance, these facts can weaken their independent contractor status defense.

App Status Determines Insurance Coverage and Wage and Hour Laws

One of the most important aspects of a rideshare case is the driver’s app status at the time of the incident. Uber and Lyft provide different levels of insurance depending on whether the driver was:

1. Logged out of the app
2. Logged in and waiting for a ride
3. On the way to pick up a passenger
4. Actively transporting a passenger

Each phase triggers a different coverage tier.

If the driver is logged out, only their personal auto insurance applies. If the driver is logged in but hasn’t yet accepted a ride, both Uber and Lyft provide limited liability coverage, often $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident in bodily injury liability, along with $25,000 in property damage coverage.

Once a ride is accepted — either during pickup or while a passenger is in the car — a much higher commercial policy applies. Both companies offer up to $1 million in liability coverage, and sometimes additional coverage types like uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Drivers can also claim online for settlement payments related to these incidents.

A key early move in your case is verifying the driver’s app status. This may require requesting logs or communication records from Uber or Lyft, which can be difficult to obtain without formal discovery. If the app status is not confirmed early, insurers may deny coverage or delay responses. Additionally, understanding the terms of any settlement agreement is crucial, as it may impact the verification process and the driver’s ability to file claims.

Identifying All Potentially Liable Parties

Uber and Lyft are not always the only parties involved in a rideshare accident. The complexity of these cases often comes from the fact that the incident may involve multiple vehicles, third-party contractors, or defective vehicle components. Individual wage claims are generally dismissed when the Labor Commissioner opts to file a lawsuit, thereby consolidating claims to improve efficiency and resource allocation.

If your client was struck by a rideshare driver while crossing the street, the driver may be primarily liable, but there may also be a rideshare claim against Uber or Lyft if the driver had a poor safety record and was allowed to continue driving.

Similarly, if a vehicle defect contributed to the crash, the vehicle manufacturer or maintenance provider may be brought in. If the driver leased the car from a company affiliated with Uber or Lyft, the leasing company may also be relevant.

This layered structure is important not only for expanding the pool of available insurance coverage and addressing wage theft claims but also for building settlement leverage. The more viable targets you identify, the more pressure you can apply in early negotiations.

Preserving Evidence from the Rideshare App for Rideshare Drivers

Digital evidence is a critical part of any rideshare case. Uber and Lyft collect an enormous amount of data through their apps, including:

• GPS tracking of all rides
• Time stamps for pick-up and drop-off
• Customer feedback
• Communications between the rider and the driver
• Driver location before and after the ride

It is crucial to follow the proper claims process and adhere to deadlines to ensure eligible drivers receive their portion of any settlement. This helps avoid potential scams and ensures that all necessary procedures are followed.

This information can help prove that a driver was actively working, that they were speeding or taking odd routes, or that they responded poorly to an emergency. It can also reveal ride cancellations, app crashes, or driver distractions.

The challenge is accessing this data. Rideshare companies are not quick to release app information without formal discovery. Attorneys should send preservation letters immediately to both the driver and the rideshare company, requesting:

• Trip history
• App logins and logouts
• GPS data for the time surrounding the crash
• Any messages or ride cancellation data

Failure to preserve this information early can cause major gaps in your rideshare claim down the line. Utilizing driver apps to access and preserve digital evidence is essential, as these apps track work hours, manage sick leave, and facilitate communication between drivers and customer support.

Corporate Policies Can Create Direct Liability

Uber and Lyft both maintain safety policies, training modules, and internal standards for drivers. These policies may be used to establish that the companies knew how drivers should behave and failed to enforce those expectations.

In some cases, the rideshare company can be directly liable for negligence in hiring, training, or supervising its drivers. This is especially true if the company allowed a driver with known issues to continue working on the platform.

To support this argument, examine:

• Prior rider complaints about the driver
• Prior traffic or criminal violations
• Accident history while driving for the platform
• Company responses to flagged driver conduct

Uber and Lyft have been known to deactivate drivers after multiple complaints, but delays in doing so can be seen as evidence of negligence. Attorneys can argue that the company had actual or constructive knowledge of dangerous driving behavior and failed to act.

Even without a traditional employment relationship, courts may allow negligence claims if it can be shown that the company retained the ability to remove or suspend drivers and failed to do so in time. Rideshare Drivers United has been at the forefront of advocating for gig drivers’ rights, emphasizing the need for fair compensation standards and addressing issues like wage theft.

Anticipate Arbitration Arguments

One of the legal tactics used by Uber and Lyft is to push for arbitration in injury cases. They may argue that the user, whether rider or driver, agreed to arbitration when accepting the app’s terms of service.

These arbitration agreements often include class action waivers and limitations on court proceedings. However, not all arbitration clauses are enforceable, especially when applied to third parties.

If your client was a pedestrian or another driver who was not using the Uber or Lyft app at the time, the rideshare company may not be able to enforce an arbitration clause. Even for riders and drivers, some courts have ruled that the clauses are procedurally unconscionable or overly broad.

When preparing your claim, be ready to respond to arbitration arguments. Investigate the jurisdiction’s prior rulings on similar clauses, and preserve your ability to challenge their application if necessary. The attorney general’s office often plays a crucial role in facilitating settlements and enforcing drivers’ rights, ensuring compliance with state employment laws and protections.

Coordinating Medical Records and Causation

Many rideshare accidents involve soft-tissue injuries, aggravation of pre-existing conditions, or delayed onset of symptoms. These issues can complicate causation and damage assessments, especially when there is a gap in treatment. Recent settlements in New York have included provisions for back pay as part of the compensation package, ensuring eligible drivers receive financial restitution.

To build a stronger claim, make sure you:

• Connect clients with medical professionals quickly
• Document any gaps in care and explain why they occurred
• Obtain expert opinions on how the accident worsened existing conditions
• Link subjective symptoms (pain, mobility loss) to objective findings where possible

Because rideshare insurers and defense attorneys often argue that injuries are minor or unrelated, early coordination between legal and medical teams is crucial. In some states, certain engaged drivers are entitled to benefits like a health insurance stipend, highlighting the importance of proper classification in the labor landscape.

Framing the Claim for Settlement Leverage

The best rideshare claims are framed not only around driver fault but around platform responsibility. This includes corporate policies, pressure to drive longer hours, lack of breaks, or failure to deactivate unsafe drivers. In fact, recent settlements have introduced even more benefits for drivers, such as additional support and guaranteed paid sick leave.

Uber and Lyft are especially sensitive to public perception. Attorneys who show that they’ve uncovered corporate conduct that might be frowned upon in the media or courtroom may be able to negotiate a favorable settlement more quickly.

Document safety violations. Cite their own internal standards. Make it clear that you are not just pursuing a standard car accident claim but are ready to challenge systemic weaknesses if needed. Legal battles often focus on ensuring fair compensation for workers, including the guarantee of receiving minimum wage, which is crucial in cases of misclassification of drivers as independent contractors.

Contact Walker Advertising for Help Growing Your Firm’s Client Base

Whether you’re a solo lawyer, or a small firm lawyer — or are part of a larger firm with plans for further expansion — it’s important to grow your client base in order to hit your revenue and client growth goals. Here at Walker Advertising, we can help. We operate a number of popular attorney networks (including our Los Defensores and 1-800-THE-LAW2 brands) through which firms are able to access leads for various legal claims. It is also crucial to provide details on how current drivers can access new benefits and information related to the settlement.

The leads we acquire through our various online marketing efforts, from social media marketing to targeted web ads, have been pre-qualified by our team so that you aren’t hassled by a flood of leads that are simply not relevant or actionable for your purposes. By accessing these quality leads, you’ll be well-equipped to select the best ones to grow your firm’s business.

Best of all, you won’t have to spend your valuable time and effort on building out your online marketing efforts. Don’t worry about SEO optimization, trend analysis, or any other complex marketing issues. Instead, use us to access pre-qualified inbound leads, and focus your limited internal resources on providing quality representation to your existing (and new) client base.

Contact Walker Advertising today to connect to a member of our team who can explain how our legal networks can help your firm’s business thrive in this ever-changing digital marketing landscape.

We look forward to assisting you.